UCLA Lets Protesters Shut Down Speaker, Threatens Conservatives Who Call It Out

UCLA protesters disrupt DHS event as school warns conservatives over identifying students

---

UCLA Lets Protesters Shut Down Speaker, Threatens Conservatives Who Call It Out

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

UCLA's School of Law let student protesters shout down a senior federal official, then threatened the conservative group that invited him with campus discipline for talking about it publicly.

The controversy began on April 21, when the UCLA Federalist Society hosted DHS General Counsel James Percival for an event titled "Inside DHS: A Conversation with General Counsel." Percival took time from running the legal operations of a major federal agency to engage UCLA law students on immigration policy. A coordinated group of protesters made sure that engagement was as difficult as possible.
Rather than discipline the disruptors, UCLA Administrator Bayrex Martí sent emails the very next day, warning Federalist Society President Matthew Weinberg not to publicly name the individuals caught on video.
“I would strongly encourage you and other organizers to not disclose those details,” Martí wrote.

The warning extended further. Martí told Weinberg that if identified students later reported harassment, the Federalist Society and its members could face campus discipline for outcomes deemed “reasonably predictable.”
“If that information is shared… the student organization and/or individual students could be connected to it… and subjected to campus processes,” Martí added.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) fired back, sending UCLA a letter calling the warning a direct threat to the Federalist Society's First Amendment rights. The university, FIRE argued, was using its conduct code as a weapon: not to punish disruption, but to silence the people who reported it.
“As painful as online criticism may be at times, UCLA may not restrict protected speech merely to shield student protesters from the consequences of their actions,” FIRE attorney Jessie Appleby wrote.

FIRE also noted the glaring double standard: Protesters had already publicly identified and mocked conservative students online, including posting photos of Weinberg taken outside the event, with no warning from the administration whatsoever.
The disruption itself was extensive and, according to McNeal, planned. More than 150 protesters gathered for the event. Those inside booed Percival, called him a "Nazi," held up profane signs reading "F— you loser," and blasted disruptive noises from their phones. Outside, demonstrators chanted "No ICE, No KKK, No Fascist USA.” UCLA's own conduct rules prohibit behavior that effectively silences a speaker. That standard was met before the first question was asked.
Read More: UCLA DEI Chief Finds Out the Hard Way That Celebrating Charlie Kirk's Murder Was a Sick Thing to Do
This is what the legal community calls a "heckler's veto": sustained disruption used as a substitute for argument. Event moderator Professor Gregory McNeal said it was coordinated in advance through messaging apps and began before the program had even formally opened.
"They weren't there to hear, listen or question, they were there to disrupt in a coordinated manner," McNeal wrote.

University of Chicago Professor Steven Durlauf noted that McNeal "moderated with much grace," a measure of just how hostile the room was. The planned open Q&A, the one forum where students could have actually challenged Percival on the merits, never happened.
Percival didn't flinch. "I really felt like I had an obligation to the people I work with not to back down, to show up and take some abuse," he said afterward. He noted that the DHS employees he works with face threats simply for showing up to their jobs every day.

UCLA Law Dean Michael Waterstone acknowledged that some individuals were warned and escorted out, and offered the standard reassurances about civility and open inquiry.
“Legal education… require[s] a willingness to question assumptions and engage opposing arguments seriously,” Waterstone said.

Fine words. But he has yet to explain why no student has faced discipline, or whether he signed off on Martí's letter threatening the Federalist Society.
UCLA insists the event "proceeded to its conclusion" and says it remains committed to free speech and academic freedom. But the record tells a different story: No disruptors punished, a conservative student group threatened with discipline for speaking publicly, and a dean who has gone quiet. UCLA has said it "plans to respond" to FIRE's letter. The legal community is watching to see if that response matches the rhetoric.

Editor's Note: President Trump is fighting to ensure America's kids get the education they deserve.
Help us fight back against Big Government waste and restore power to the states. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.